How Much is too Much? High Utilization of Prenatal Care and Its Impact on Primary Cesarean Birth Among Women in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Nationally, cesarean birth is one of the most performed surgical procedures, yet cesarean births have been linked to an increased risk of delivery complications. Prenatal care (PNC) and education are possible strategies to reduce the number of cesarean births. However, there is scant research assessing the impact of these strategies on safely reducing primary cesarean births. This study evaluates the association between the adequacy of PNC utilization and primary cesarean birth. METHODS: The analysis used 2018 birth certificate data, and the sample included nulliparous women with no reported pregnancy or delivery complications (N = 729,140). Logistic regression was used to model the association between the adequacy of PNC utilization and delivery method, as well as identify other factors associated with the delivery method. RESULTS: Among women with a primary cesarean birth, 36.2% had received adequate plus PNC. After adjustment, there was no significant association between women receiving inadequate, intermediate, or adequate PNC and primary cesarean birth. However, women who received adequate plus PNC had an increased odds of having a primary cesarean birth compared to women with no PNC (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.18-1.28). DISCUSSION: Findings from this study highlight the need to further understand the role of PNC and its potential impact on the delivery method. Within the patient-provider relationship, healthcare providers have the unique opportunity to provide education and inform patients of the risks and benefits of all delivery options. Thus, there is an increased opportunity to safely reduce primary cesarean births.

Evaluating the Impact of CenteringPregnancy Program Versus Individual Prenatal Care on Gestational Weight Gain.

Introduction: The CenteringPregnancy (CP) program-proven to reduce preterm births-was modified to achieve more optimal gestational weight gain (GWG) by an intentional incorporation of nutrition education. We compared the effect of the modified CP program versus individual prenatal care (IPNC) on GWG. Methods: This observational study used linked birth certificate data and hospital discharge records of women who received prenatal care (PNC) in South Carolina Midlands' obstetric clinics between 2015 and 2019. Linear and multinomial logistic regressions were used to compare participants in CP (n = 568) versus IPNC on weight gain, measured by total GWG (delivery weight minus prepregnancy weight), weekly rate of weight gain, and meeting the Institute of Medicine's recommendations (inadequate, adequate, and excessive GWG). Nonrandom assignment to program was controlled by propensity scoring. Results: CP participants differed from IPNC participants in race, nulliparous, education, and type of health insurance, but not in parity or month PNC began (p-Value <0.05). CP and IPNC participants had a similar GWG experience: total GWG (coef(ß) = -0.054; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.78 to 0.6), total weekly weight gain (coef(ß) = -0.004; 95% CI -0.03 to 0.03), total GWG category (inadequate GWG: RRR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.64-1.21, and excessive GWG: relative risk ratio (RRR) = 0.92, 95% CI 0.71-1.20 vs. adequate), and weekly weight gain category (inadequate GWG: RRR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.53-1.01, and excessive GWG: RRR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.61-1.13 vs. adequate). Conclusion: The CP program with an enhanced nutritional knowledge component was not associated with achieving recommended GWG. Further investigation is needed to explain the lack of impact.

Assessing hospital differences in low-risk cesarean delivery metrics in Florida.

BACKGROUND: Unnecessary cesarean deliveries lead to increased maternal and neonatal morbidities and mortalities. In 2020, Florida had a cesarean delivery rate of 35.9%, the third highest in the nation. An effective quality improvement strategy to reduce overall cesarean delivery rates is to decrease primary cesarean deliveries in low-risk births (nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex). Of note, 3 nationally accepted hospital measures of low-risk cesarean delivery rates include the nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex; Joint Commission; and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine metrics. Comparing metrics is necessary because accurate and timely measurement is essential to support multihospital quality improvement efforts to reduce low-risk cesarean delivery rates and improve the quality of maternal care. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess differences in hospital low-risk cesarean delivery rates in Florida using 5 different metrics of low-risk cesarean delivery rate based on (1) risk methodology, nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex; Joint Commission; and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine metrics, and (2) data source, linked birth certificate and hospital discharge records and hospital discharge records only. STUDY DESIGN: This was a population-based study of live Florida births from 2016 to 2019 to compare 5 approaches to calculating low-risk cesarean delivery rates. Analyses were performed using linked birth certificate data and inpatient hospital discharge data. The 5 low-risk cesarean delivery measures were defined as follows: nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex birth certificate; Joint Commission-linked used Joint Commission exclusions; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine-linked used Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine exclusions; Joint Commission hospital discharge with Joint Commission exclusions; and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine hospital discharge with Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine exclusions. Nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex birth certificate was based on data from birth certificates and not using linked hospital discharge data. Designated as nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex, it does not exclude other high-risk conditions. The second and third measures (Joint Commission-linked used Joint Commission exclusions and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine-linked used Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine exclusions) use data elements from the full-linked dataset to designate nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex and excluded several high-risk conditions. The last 2 measures (Joint Commission hospital discharge with Joint Commission exclusions; and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine hospital discharge with Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine exclusions) were based on data from hospital discharge data only and not using linked birth certificate data. These measures generally reflect term, singleton, and vertex because parity could not be assessed adequately on hospital discharge data. Hospital differences between these 5 measures were calculated overall and by neonatal intensive care unit level. RESULTS: Overall, the median of hospital low-risk cesarean rates decreased across the measures, from NTSV-BC 30.7%, to Joint Commission linked 29.1%, and Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine hospital discharge 29.2% with a large decrease to Joint Commission hospital discharge 19.4% and Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine hospital discharge 18.1%. A similar trend was seen by neonatal intensive care unit level. For each of the measures, level II had the highest median low-risk cesarean rates (nulliparous. term, singleton, vertex birth certificate) 32.7%, Joint Commission linked (31.4%), Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine linked: 31.1%, Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine hospital discharge 19.3%), except for level III Joint Commission hospital discharge (20.0%). A comparison of the median number of low-risk births overall and by neonatal intensive care unit level showed a decreasing number across the linked and hospital discharge measures. Again, a wide gap in low-risk cesarean delivery rates was identified between linked measures and hospital discharge measures. However, this gap narrowed as hospital rates increased. CONCLUSION: Quality monitoring of low-risk cesarean delivery rates measured by the nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex metric using the birth certificate was fairly accurate and provided timely assessment for use by Florida hospitals. The nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex birth certificate rates were comparable with low-risk metrics using the linked data source. Overall, metrics used within the same data source had similar rates, with the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine metric having the lowest rates. Across data sources, metrics using hospital discharge data only resulted in substantially underestimated rates because of the inclusion of multiparous women and should be interpreted with caution.

Race and Ethnicity Misclassification in Hospital Discharge Data and the Impact on Differences in Severe Maternal Morbidity Rates in Florida.

Hospital discharge (HD) records contain important information that is used in public health and health care sectors. It is becoming increasingly common to rely mostly or exclusively on HD data to assess and monitor severe maternal morbidity (SMM) overall and by sociodemographic characteristics, including race and ethnicity. Limited studies have validated race and ethnicity in HD or provided estimates on the impact of assessing health differences in maternity populations. This study aims to determine the differences in race and ethnicity reporting between HD and birth certificate (BC) data for maternity hospitals in Florida and to estimate the impact of race and ethnicity misclassification on state- and hospital-specific SMM rates. We conducted a population-based retrospective study of live births using linked BC and HD records from 2016 to 2019 (n = 783,753). BC data were used as the gold standard. Race and ethnicity were categorized as non-Hispanic (NH)-White, NH-Black, Hispanic, NH-Asian Pacific Islander (API), and NH-American Indian or Alaskan Native (AIAN). Overall, race and ethnicity misclassification and its impact on SMM at the state- and hospital levels were estimated. At the state level, NH-AIAN women were the most misclassified (sensitivity: 28.2%; positive predictive value (PPV): 25.2%) and were commonly classified as NH-API (30.3%) in HD records. NH-API women were the next most misclassified (sensitivity: 57.3%; PPV: 85.4%) and were commonly classified as NH-White (5.8%) or NH-other (5.5%). At the hospital level, wide variation in sensitivity and PPV with negative skewing was identified, particularly for NH-White, Hispanic, and NH-API women. Misclassification did not result in large differences in SMM rates at the state level for all race and ethnicity categories except for NH-AIAN women (% difference 78.7). However, at the hospital level, Hispanic women had wide variability of a percent difference in SMM rates and were more likely to have underestimated SMM rates. Reducing race and ethnicity misclassification on HD records is key in assessing and addressing SMM differences and better informing surveillance, research, and quality improvement efforts.

Maternal Hepatitis C Virus Infection and Adverse Newborn Outcomes in the US.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the relationship between maternal hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and infant health. Furthermore, we evaluated racial disparities with these associations. METHODS: Using 2017 US birth certificate data, we investigated the association between maternal HCV infection and infant birthweight, preterm birth, and Apgar score. We used unadjusted and adjusted linear regression and logistic regression models. Models were adjusted for use of prenatal care, maternal age, maternal education, maternal smoking status, and the presence of other sexually transmitted infections. We stratified the models by race to describe the experiences of White and Black women separately. RESULTS: Maternal HCV infection was associated with reduced infant birthweight on average by 42.0 g (95% CI: -58.81, -25.30) for women of all races, 64.6 g (95% CI: -81.91, -47.26) for White women and 80.3 g (95% CI: -162.48, 1.93) for Black women. Women with maternal HCV infection had increased odds of having a preterm birth of 1.06 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.17) for women of all races, 1.06 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.18) for White women and 1.35 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.97) for Black women. Overall, women with maternal HCV infection had increased odds 1.26 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.55) of having a low/intermediate Apgar score; White and Black women with HCV infection had similarly increased odds of an infant with low/intermediate Apgar score in a stratified analysis: 1.23 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.53) for White women and 1.24 (95% CI: 0.51, 3.02) for Black women. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal HCV infection was associated with lower infant birthweight and higher odds of having a low/intermediate Apgar score. Given the potential for residual confounding, these results should be interpreted with caution.

Closure of Labor & Delivery units in rural counties is associated with reduced adequacy of prenatal care, even when prenatal care remains available.

PURPOSE: Closure of rural Labor & Delivery (L&D) units can impact timely access to hospital-based obstetrical care. Iowa has lost over a quarter of its L&D units in the previous decade. Assessing the effect of these closures on prenatal care in those rural communities is important to understanding the full effect of unit closures on maternal health care. METHODS: Using birth certificate data in Iowa from 2017 to 2019, the initiation of prenatal care and adequacy of prenatal visits were assessed for 47 rural counties in Iowa. Of these, 7 experienced a closure of the only L&D unit between 1/1/2018 and 1/1/2019. The impact of these closures is modeled for all birthing parents and compared for Medicaid versus non-Medicaid recipients. FINDINGS: All 7 counties that experienced the loss of their only L&D unit continued to have prenatal care services available. Experiencing a closure of an L&D unit was associated with a lower likelihood of overall adequate prenatal care but not significantly associated with a lower rate of first-trimester prenatal care utilization. Among Medicaid recipients of the communities where an L&D unit closed, there was an association of closure with both a lower likelihood of adequate prenatal care and entry to prenatal care after the first trimester. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of prenatal care is lower in rural communities following L&D unit closure, especially among Medicaid recipients. This suggests that the overall maternal health systems were disrupted by the closure of the L&D unit, impacting the utilization of services that remained available to the community.

Labor & delivery unit closures most impact travel times to birth locations for micropolitan residents in Iowa.

PURPOSE: Continued closure of rural hospitals and labor & delivery units can impact timely access to care. Iowa has lost over a quarter of its labor & delivery units in the previous decade. Calculating how travel times to labor & delivery services have changed, and where in the state the largest travel times take place, are important for understanding access to this critical service. METHODS: Using parental address and facility location from birth certificate data in Iowa from 2013 to 2019, travel times to birth facility are assessed for rural, micropolitan, and metropolitan parents, as well as for complicated versus noncomplicated births and Medicaid versus non-Medicaid recipients. FINDINGS: Parts of the state have travel times that are consistently greater than 30 minutes over the duration of the study. The largest increases in travel times are found among micropolitan residents, particularly those experiencing complicated births. Travel times are consistently the longest for rural residents but increased only slightly over the study time period. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that access to hospital-based obstetric care is most changed for residents of small towns rather than rural or larger city residents.

Improving birth certificate data accuracy in Alabama.

Objective: Accurate vital statistics data are critical for monitoring population health and strategizing public health interventions. Previous analyses of statewide birth data have identified several factors that may reduce birth certificate accuracy including systematic errors and limited data review by clinicians. The aim of this initiative was to increase the proportion of hospitals in Alabama reporting accurate birth certificate data from 67% to 87% within 1 year. Methods: The Alabama Perinatal Quality Collaborative led this statewide collaborative effort. Process measures included monthly monitoring of 11 variables across 5-10 patient birth certificates per month per hospital. Accuracy determination, defined as ≥95% accuracy of the variables analyzed, was performed by health care specialists at each hospital by comparing birth certificate variables from vital statistics with data obtained from original hospital source materials. Three months of retrospective, baseline accuracy data were collected before project initiation from which actionable drivers and change ideas were identified at individual hospitals. Data were analyzed using statistical process control measures. Results: Thirty-one hospitals entered data throughout the course of the initiative, accounting for 850 chart analyses and 9350 variable assessments. The least accurately reported variables included birth weight, maternal hypertension, and antenatal corticosteroid exposure. At baseline, 67% of hospitals reported birth certificate accuracy rates ≥ 95%, which increased to 90% of hospitals within 2 months and was sustained for the remainder of the initiative. Conclusion: Statewide, multidisciplinary quality improvement efforts increased birth certificate accuracy vital to public health surveillance.

Sexual and/or gender minority parental structures among California births from 2016 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: Sexual and/or gender minority people account for roughly 7.1% of the US population, and an estimated one-third are parents. Little is known about sexual and/or gender minority people who become pregnant, despite this population having documented healthcare disparities that may affect pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to describe parental structures among birth parents and the prepregnancy characteristics of parents giving birth in likely sexual and/or gender minority parental structures from California birth certificates. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a population-based study using birth certificate data from all live births in California from 2016 through 2020 (n=2,257,974). The state amended its birth certificate in 2016 to enable the recording of more diverse parental roles. Now, parents on birth certificates are classified as "parent giving birth" and "parent not giving birth" and people in either role can identify as "mother," "father," or "parent." We examined all potential combinations of parenting roles, and grouped parental structures of "mother-mother" and those designating a "father" as the "parent giving birth" into likely sexual and/or gender minority groups. We assessed the distribution of prepregnancy characteristics across parental structure groups ("mother-father," "sexual and/or gender minority," "mother only," "unclassified," and "missing both parental roles"). RESULTS: Sexual and/or gender minority parents accounted for 6802 (0.3%) of live births in California over the 5-year study period. The most common sexual and/or gender minority parental structures were "mother-mother" (n=4310; 63% of the group) and "father-father" (n=1486; 22% of the group). Compared with "parents giving birth" in the "mother-father" structure (n=2,055,038; 91%), a higher proportion of "parents giving birth" in the "sexual and/or gender minority" group were aged ≥35 years, White, college-educated, and had commercial health insurance. In addition, a higher proportion had a high prepregnancy body mass index. Although likely underreported overall, the proportion of those who used assisted reproductive technology was much higher in the "sexual and/or gender minority" group (1.4%) than in the "mother-father" group (0.05%). Cigarette smoking in the 3 months before pregnancy was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Changes to the California birth certificate have revealed a multiplicity of parental structures. Our findings suggest that sexual and/or gender minority parents differ from other parental structures and from the general sexual and/or gender minority population and warrant further research.

Validation of birth certificate and maternal recall of events in labor and delivery with medical records in the Iowa health in pregnancy study.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological research of events related to labor and delivery frequently uses maternal interview or birth certificates as a primary method of data collection; however, the validity of these data are rarely confirmed. This study aimed to examine the validity of birth certificate data and maternal interview of maternal demographics and events related to labor and delivery with data abstracted from medical records in a US setting. METHODS: Birth certificate and maternal recall data from the Iowa Health in Pregnancy Study (IHIPS), a population-based case-control study of risk factors for preterm and small-for-gestational age births, were linked to medical record data to assess the validity of events that occurred during labor and delivery along with reported maternal demographics. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and kappa scores were calculated. RESULTS: Postpartum maternal recall and birth certificate data were excellent for infant characteristics (birth weight, gestational age, infant sex) and variables related to labor and delivery (mode of delivery) when compared with medical records. Birth certificate data for labor induction had low sensitivity (46.3%) and positive predictive value (18.3%) compared to medical records. Compared to maternal interview, birth certificate data also had poor agreement for smoking and alcohol use during pregnancy. Agreement between all three methods of data collection was very low for pregnancy weight gain (kappa = 0.07-0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Maternal interview and birth certificate data can be a valid source for collecting data on infant characteristics and events that occurred during labor and delivery. However, caution should be used if solely using birth certificate data to gather data on maternal demographic and/or lifestyle factors.

Birth registration policies in the United States and their relevance to sexual and/or gender minority families: Identifying existing strengths and areas of improvement.

Birth certificates are some of the most critical identity documents available to current residents of the United States, yet sexual and gender minority (SGM) parents frequently face barriers in obtaining accurate documents for their children. It is essential for SGM parents to have accurate birth certificates for their children at the time of birth registration so that they do not experience undue burden in raising their children and establishing their status as legal parents. In this analysis, we focused on the birth registration process in the US as they apply to SGM family-building and the assignation of parentage on birth certificates at the time of a child's birth. We utilized keyword-based search criteria to identify, collect, and tabulate official state policies related to birth registration. Birth registration policies rely on gendered, heteronormative assumptions about the sex and gender of a child's parents in all but three states when identifying the birthing person and in all but eight states when identifying the non-birthing person. We found additional barriers for SGM parents who give birth outside of a marriage or legal union. These barriers leave SGM parents particularly vulnerable to inaccuracies on their children's identity documents and incomplete recognition of their parental roles and rights. Existing birth registration policies also do little to ensure the inclusion of diverse family structures in administrative data collection. There are many ways to modify existing birth registration policies and enhance the inclusion of SGM parents within governmental administrative structures. We conclude with suggestions to improve upon existing birth registration systems by de-linking parental sex and gender from birthing role, parental role, and contribution to the pregnancy.

Addressing legal issues in cross-border gestational surrogacy: current topics and trends.

This article provides a general overview of the practical management of legal issues in cross-border gestational surrogacy. Particular problems arising from the global pandemic as well as a number of proposed solutions are presented and analyzed. A section addressing the involvement of the fertility center in such arrangements is included. Additionally, the article discusses how parentage and citizenship are handled abroad, with a focus on the United Kingdom.

Assessing the relationship between neonatal abstinence syndrome and birth defects in Delaware.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is a withdrawal syndrome in newborns and is frequently caused by maternal opioid use during pregnancy. Our study examines whether NAS is associated with birth defects in Delaware. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of linked Delaware birth certificate data (BCD), hospital discharge data (HDD), and birth defects registry (BDR) data to examine the association between NAS and birth defects for all hospital births to Delaware residents from 2010 to 2017. Birth defects data were abstracted from medical records from Delaware's BDR. We used International Classification of Diseases Ninth and Tenth Revision Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM/ICD-10-CM) 779.5 and P96.1 codes to determine NAS using HDD and excluded iatrogenic cases of NAS. We estimated crude and adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: During 2010-2017, there were 2,784 cases of birth defects and 1,651 cases of NAS in Delaware. Among infants with a diagnosis of NAS, 56 also had a birth defect (3.4%), similar to 2,728 birth defects among 79,636 infants without a diagnosis of NAS (3.4%). We found no statistically significant association between an NAS diagnosis and birth defects (adjusted odds ratios = 1.0; 95% CI: 0.8-1.3). CONCLUSIONS: Our multiyear state-wide study using linked BCD, HDD, and BDR data for Delaware did not show a statistically significant association between infants diagnosed with NAS and birth defects, overall.

Educational Attainment of Grandmothers and Preterm Birth in Grandchildren.

BACKGROUND: Maternal education has been shown repeatedly to be inversely associated with preterm birth. Both preterm birth and educational level of families are correlated across generations, but it is not clear if educational level of grandparents affects the risk of preterm delivery of their grandchildren, and, if so, if the association with grandmother's education is independent of mother's education. METHODS: We used New Jersey birth certificates to create a transgenerational dataset to examine the effect of grandmother's education on risk of PTB in White, Black and Hispanic grandchildren. We matched birth certificates of girls born in 1979-1983 to mothers listed on NJ birth certificates for the years 1999-2011. Thus, grandmothers were the women delivering in 1979-1983, and mothers were those born to the grandmothers who in turn delivered grandchildren in 1999-2011. We performed descriptive tabulations and multivariate logistic regression to develop risk estimates. RESULTS: Overall, maternal education was associated inversely with PTB in each of the demographic groups. There was a substantial inter-generational increase in education between grandmothers and mothers in each group, which was most striking in Hispanics After adjusting for maternal age and education, grandmother's education continued to be associated with preterm birth of her grandchildren. CONCLUSIONS: Grandmother's education was an additional, independent predictor of PTB in her grandchildren. This result supports the idea that mother's childhood and preconception socioeconomic environment, including the educational level of her childhood household affect her reproductive health.

Status and associated factors of birth registration in selected districts of Tigray region, Ethiopia.

BACKGROUND: Birth registration establishes the existence of a child under law and provides the foundation for ensuring many of his/her rights. Despite its significance, a continuous, effective and comprehensive birth registration system has not been established in Ethiopia until the recent past. This paper examines the status of child's birth registration and its associated factors in selected districts of Tigray Region, Ethiopia. METHOD: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from April to May 2018 among 383 randomly selected mothers who had given birth to at least one child since August 2016. A structured questionnaire was used to gather the quantitative data. Qualitative data were collected using key informant interviews and focus group discussions. To analyze the data, SPSS version 20 was used. Logistic regression analysis was employed to assess the association between dependent and independent variables. RESULTS: Findings reveal that significant number of the respondents did not have knowhow about birth registration and its uses. As a result, only 117(30%) of them registered the birth of their children and secured certificates. Inaccessibility of the registrar offices, lack of relevant manpower and political will of the government were reported as major reasons for such a gap. Mother's education was identified to be positively associated with the likelihood of a child being registered. Children born from mothers living in urban areas were found more likely to be registered compared to their rural counterpart [AOR = 1.46, 95% CI = 0.76, 2.76]. In light of Religion, children from the Muslim community had better opportunity for birth registration and owning birth certificate compared to children from Orthodox Christian parents. Compared to those who have possessed own birth certificates, the likelihood of mothers who did not possess own birth certificates to register the birth of their children was found lower by the factor of 86% [AOR = 0.14, 95%CI = 0.07, 0.26]. CONCLUSION: Birth registration of a child and subsequent issuance of certificate should be pursued as a right issue. To make this a reality, extensive awareness raising programs that underscore the need for a birth registration and its significance for rural communities is needless to say critical.

The association between interpregnancy interval and severe maternal morbidities using revised national birth certificate data: A probabilistic bias analysis.

BACKGROUND: Severe maternal morbidity continues to be on the rise in the US. Short birth spacing is a modifiable risk factor associated with maternal morbidity, yet few studies have examined this association, possibly due to few available data sources to examine these rare events. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between interpregnancy interval (IPI) and severe maternal morbidity using near-national birth certificate data and account for known under-reporting using probabilistic bias analysis. METHODS: We used revised 2014-2017 birth certificate data, restricting to resident women with a non-first-born singleton birth. We examined the following: (a) maternal blood transfusion, (b) admission to intensive care unit (ICU), (c) uterine rupture (among women with a prior caesarean delivery) and (d) third- or fourth-degree perineal laceration (among vaginal deliveries) by IPI categories (<6, 6-11, 12-17, 18-23, 24-59 and 60+ months). Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using log-binomial regression, adjusting for select maternal characteristics. Probabilistic bias analyses were performed. RESULTS: Compared with IPI 18 to 23 months, adjusted models revealed that the risk of maternal transfusion followed a U-shaped curve with IPI, while risk of ICU admission and perineal laceration increased with longer IPI. Risk of uterine rupture was highest among IPI <6 months. With the exception of maternal transfusion, these findings persisted regardless of the extent or type of misclassification examined in bias analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Associations between IPI and maternal morbidity varied by outcome, even after adjusting for misclassification of SMM. Differences across maternal health outcomes should be considered when counselling and making recommendations regarding optimal birth spacing.

Assisted reproductive technology use in the United States: a population assessment.

OBJECTIVE: To study social and demographic differentiation of assisted reproduction technology (ART) use at the population level in the United States. DESIGN: Population-based study. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Women 15-49 years old in the American Community Survey and National Vital Statistics Birth Certificate data from 2010-2017. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Birth rate after ART by major sociodemographic categories and likelihood of having an ART birth. RESULT(S): Net of education, age, period, and marital status, the incidence rates of ART births are lower for black women (0.57 times; 95% CI, 0.52-0.62) and Hispanic women (0.67 times; 95% CI, 0.57-0.62) relative to white women's rates; for Asian women, the incidence rates are 1.21 times that of white women's rates. Further, the incidence rates of ART births are higher for women with more than a 4-year degree (2.08 times; 95% CI, 1.90-2.27) relative to women with a 4-year degree, and are lower for women with less education. Women who are married have an incidence rate of ART that is 5.72 times (95% CI, 5.37-6.09) that of unmarried women. The incidence rates for 2013-2016 are statistically significantly higher than for 2010 by a factor of 1.16 (95% CI, 1.02-1.31), 1.16 (95% CI, 1.03-1.31), 1.27 (95% CI, 1.12-1.43), and 1.51 (95% CI, 1.43-1.82), respectively. The educational differences in ART exist across all age groups from 20 to 49, but are the largest among the 35-39 and 40-44 age groups. CONCLUSION(S): Large differences in the risk of an ART birth and the proportion of births and the total fertility rate due to ART exist across period, age, race, education, and marital status groups in the United States. Current measures of ART births may disguise an unmet need for ART.

Brief report: Assessing the risk of reporting bias in a RCT for adolescent mothers.

INTRODUCTION: Most adolescent sexual and reproductive health studies rely solely upon self-report surveys to assess key variables such as pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). The current study investigated the risk of reporting bias that may result from using such surveys to measure outcomes in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: As part of an RCT of a multicomponent intervention to delay repeat pregnancy among adolescent mothers, we compared survey data on repeat pregnancy with birth records from a state's vital statistics system. The survey assessed contraceptive use, pregnancy status, and future pregnancy intentions. The sample consisted of American adolescents ages 18 and 19 years who were at least 28 weeks pregnant or less than nine weeks postpartum. RESULTS: For 14 of 331 study participants (4 percent), we found a birth record in the vital statistics system for a mother who reported not having gotten pregnant on the survey. We found no evidence of underreporting for the other survey respondents. The rate of underreporting was similar for the intervention and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: A low rate of underreporting for repeat pregnancy in adolescent mothers was found in the present sample.

Subprime Babies: The Foreclosure Crisis and Initial Health Endowments.

The subprime mortgage crisis was a devastating financial shock for many homeowners. This research uses a probabilistic matching strategy to link foreclosure records with birth certificate records from 2006 to 2010 in California to identify birth parents who experienced a foreclosure. Among mothers who did, those issued a loan during the peak of subprime lending from 2005 to 2007 were more Hispanic and socioeconomically disadvantaged than mothers with loans originating before 2005. We use a mother fixed-effects analyses of ever-foreclosed mothers issued a loan during 2006 and 2007 and find that infants in gestation during or after the foreclosure had a lower birth weight for gestational age than those born earlier, suggesting that the foreclosure crisis was a plausible contributor to disparities in initial health endowments.

Proposed dairy calf birth certificate data and death loss categorization scheme.

The majority of dairy heifer calves in the United States are destined to be dairy replacements. However, many dairy heifer and bull calves die before 6 mo of age. Of these calves, about 6% (more than 500,000 calves) die at birth or shortly after (i.e., currently termed "stillbirth"). An additional 6% of dairy heifers die during the preweaning period. Death loss in dairy calves is primarily due to stillbirths, failure to adapt to extrauterine life, and infectious disease processes. The reasons for preweaning heifer calf deaths caused by infectious diseases are generally categorized based on easily recognizable clinical signs such as digestive disease/scours or respiratory disease. Most causes of calf death can be mitigated by appropriate preventive care or well-tailored treatments, meaning that the typical death loss percentage could be decreased with better management. Producers could gather information on the circumstances near birth and at death if they had appropriate guidance on what details to record and monitor. This paper provides recommendations on data to collect at the time of birth (i.e., calf birth certificate data). The recording of these critical pieces of information is valuable in evaluating trends over time in morbidity and mortality events in dairy calves. Ideally, necropsy examination would substantially improve the identification of cause of death, but even without necropsy, attribution of cause of death can be improved by more carefully defining death loss categories in on-farm record systems. We propose a death loss categorization scheme that more clearly delineates causes of death. Recommendations are provided for additional data to be collected at the time of death. Recording and analyzing birth certificate and death loss data will allow producers and veterinarians to better evaluate associations between calf risk factors and death, with the goal of reducing dairy calf mortality.